Loading article…
Bitwise’s André Dragosch says the Bitcoin S2F forecast of $222,000 ignores demand factors, with institutional buying now over seven times the halving supply
Bitcoin’s widely‑cited stock‑to‑flow (S2F) model still projects a $222,000 peak for this cycle, but Bitwise analyst André Dragosch cautioned that the model’s focus on supply‑side halvings ignores demand‑side forces that now dominate the market [2].
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| S2F price target | $222,000 |
| Institutional demand vs. supply reduction | > 7 × |
| Current price floor | > $100,000 |
| Key catalyst | Surge in Bitcoin ETFs and treasury holdings |
The S2F framework, created by PlanB in 2019, links Bitcoin’s price to its scarcity ratio—stock (existing supply) divided by flow (annual new supply) [3]. Dragosch notes that while the model predicts a $222,000 price by the end of the current cycle, it “fails to consider demand‑side factors” [2]. Institutional demand, measured through Bitcoin exchange‑traded products (ETPs) and treasury holdings, now exceeds the annualised supply reduction from the latest halving by more than sevenfold [2]. This demand has helped keep Bitcoin above the $100,000 level, establishing a price floor that the S2F model does not account for [2].
Other valuation frameworks offer lower, yet still bullish, estimates. The BAERM (Halving Supply Shock) model places Bitcoin’s fair value near $159,000 and projects $173,000 by the end of 2025 [3]. The Power Law model, which ties price to a time‑based formula, forecasts a 10‑year price of $2.03 million—substantially below the S2F peak but above the BAERM level [3]. Dragosch highlights statistical flaws in the S2F approach, including omitted variables and a negative drift in residuals, suggesting the model may be “misspecified” for today’s demand‑driven market [3].
ETF inflows and treasury purchases have become a primary source of price support. Data shows sustained institutional interest, with Bitcoin ETPs absorbing supply at rates far exceeding the halving‑driven flow [2]. This shift implies that future price movements may be more closely tied to the pace of institutional adoption than to the timing of halvings alone.
Dragosch’s warning underscores a broader debate: as Bitcoin’s market matures, traditional scarcity‑based models may need to incorporate demand dynamics to remain useful. Whether the S2F model can adapt or be supplanted by demand‑focused frameworks remains an open question for investors and analysts alike.
Coverage is mostly measured — 115 of 126 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 4 outlets · Aug 1, 2026 · How we report
It is a mathematical ratio calculated by dividing the total existing supply of an asset (stock) by the amount of new supply produced annually (flow).
Halving events reduce the block reward for miners by 50%, which lowers the annual flow of new Bitcoin and increases the S2F ratio, theoretically signaling higher scarcity.
While it was influential in earlier cycles, its predictive accuracy has weakened as Bitcoin's price has frequently deviated from the model's projections, leading many to use it as a historical reference instead.
The model is applied because Bitcoin has a limited, code-defined supply schedule, making it comparable to scarce physical commodities like gold.