Loading article…
The House Ways and Means Committee voted 38-5 to advance the Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act, a bill that would set new federal crypto tax rules by 2028.
The House Ways and Means Committee voted 38-5 on Wednesday to advance the Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act, a legislative package that would establish the first federal tax framework for digital assets and impact more than 67 million Americans who hold cryptocurrency [1, 3]. The bill now heads to the House floor, marking a significant step toward formalizing tax treatment for crypto transactions, lending, and mining rewards [3, 4].
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Committee Vote | 38-5 in favor |
| Projected 10-Year Revenue | $500 million |
| De Minimis Threshold | $10 per transaction |
| Legislative Status | Awaiting House floor vote |
The legislation, introduced by Chairman Jason Smith, aims to align digital asset tax rules with those currently governing stocks and other traditional investments [1, 3]. A central component of the bill is the introduction of a "de minimis" exemption, which would allow users to ignore capital gains or losses on blockchain network or transaction fees of $10 or less [2, 3]. While the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates this exemption will reduce federal revenue by $2.365 billion over a ten-year period, the bill includes other measures—such as the extension of wash-sale restrictions to digital assets—that are projected to result in a net revenue increase of $500 million over the same decade [3].
The bill also clarifies the tax status of stablecoins by using their redemption value as the tax basis when purchased near that value [4]. Additionally, it establishes that income earned from validating transactions through mining or staking will be treated as ordinary income [3, 4]. Despite this, the legislation leaves the specific timing of when such income must be recognized—a critical concern for holders who receive rewards without converting them into dollars—unresolved [3].
The advancement of H.R. 10357 follows a failed attempt in the Senate to pass the CLARITY Act, highlighting a shift toward committee-led legislative tracks as the 119th Congress approaches its January conclusion [1]. During the markup process, the committee rejected several amendments proposed by Representative Lloyd Doggett, including measures that would have required studies on the energy impact of crypto mining and mandated stricter disclosures for decentralized platforms [3].
While the bill received bipartisan support, lawmakers acknowledged that it serves as a baseline for future regulation rather than a comprehensive solution [3]. Because the bill must still clear the full House, the Senate, and receive a presidential signature, its ultimate enactment remains subject to the legislative calendar [1, 4].
The bill represents a rare moment of bipartisan consensus on crypto policy, yet its silence on the mechanics of staking rewards leaves a significant technical gap that may require future legislative intervention [3]. Whether the measure can navigate the remaining procedural hurdles before the current Congress adjourns remains the primary uncertainty for market participants [1, 4].
Coverage is mostly measured — 195 of 204 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 5 outlets · Sep 17, 2026 · How we report
As of September 2024, the CLARITY Act, which would have permitted banks to engage in Crypto Lending against collateral, failed a Senate procedural vote. Meanwhile, the House Ways and Means Committee is considering H.R. 10357, which aims to clarify tax rules for Crypto Lending arrangements.
H.R. 10357 would allow qualifying Crypto Lending agreements to follow tax treatment currently available for securities lending. This change would prevent the temporary transfer of digital assets under a loan agreement from being classified as an immediate taxable sale.
Some lawmakers, such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren, oppose bank-involved Crypto Lending because they believe it would put consumer savings deposits at risk. These critics argue that the high volatility of digital assets makes them unsuitable for use as collateral within the traditional banking system.