Loading article…
The House Ways and Means Committee is reviewing a bill to overhaul crypto taxes, aiming for a $500 million revenue increase through new trading rules.
The House Ways and Means Committee is set to consider the Digital Asset Tax Certainty Act on Sept. 16, a 114-page legislative package that would rewrite federal tax treatment for digital assets to generate an estimated $500 million in net revenue between 2027 and 2036 [1]. The bill seeks to balance tax relief for routine crypto usage with stricter securities-style regulations for traders, marking a significant shift in how the government approaches digital asset taxation [2].
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Projected Revenue | $500 million (2027–2036) |
| Fee Exemption | $10 per transaction |
| Wash-Sale Impact | $1.707 billion revenue increase |
| Markup Date | Sept. 16 |
The legislation proposes a central trade-off: easing tax friction for everyday users while closing loopholes for active traders. Under the bill, users would be exempt from calculating gains or losses on blockchain network and transaction fees under $10, a provision estimated to reduce federal receipts by $2.365 billion through 2036 [2]. However, this relief excludes accounts with more than 5,000 transfers in the prior year [1].
To offset these reductions, the bill extends federal wash-sale and constructive-sale rules to digital assets, preventing investors from selling at a loss and immediately repurchasing the same asset to claim a tax benefit [1]. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates this change will increase federal receipts by $1.707 billion over the budget window [2]. Additionally, the bill expands mark-to-market accounting for professional digital-asset dealers, a move projected to raise another $2.332 billion [2].
The proposal introduces specific rules for U.S. dollar stablecoins, exempting them from standard capital gains calculations if they remain within prescribed bands around their $1 redemption value [2]. This special treatment aims to prevent minor peg fluctuations from creating constant, cumbersome tax events for users [2].
The bill also addresses the growing sector of crypto lending and staking, though it stops short of industry requests to defer taxes on rewards. Validation income from mining and staking would be treated as ordinary income upon receipt, requiring miners and validators to value these rewards immediately [1]. While the bill allows for tax-advantaged treatment of certain digital-asset loans—aligning them with securities lending—it maintains the current timing framework that recognizes staking rewards as taxable income when the taxpayer gains control of them [2].
The bill’s ultimate impact remains contingent on whether lawmakers can maintain the delicate balance between incentivizing crypto adoption through fee relief and securing billions in new revenue through expanded trading regulations. Whether these compromises hold during the upcoming markup will signal the appetite for broader digital asset reform in the current legislative session [2].
Coverage is mostly measured — 192 of 201 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 4 outlets · Sep 16, 2026 · How we report
H.R. 10357 extends tax treatment currently available for securities lending to qualifying digital-asset loans. This change aims to prevent temporary transfers of crypto under lending agreements from being classified as taxable sales, provided the transactions meet specific economic requirements.
Critics argue that crypto platforms offering interest-like incentives on stablecoins can lure deposits away from community banks. This potential deposit flight is viewed as a risk to the ability of community banks to provide credit to local households, farms, and small businesses.
The CLARITY Act provides the Treasury Department with 'circuit-breaker' authority to restrict stablecoin yield offerings if deposit flight from community banks is identified. However, critics maintain that the legislation contains significant loopholes regarding anti-money laundering rules and fails to provide adequate regulatory oversight for decentralized finance operators.