Loading article…
Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin calls the Bitcoin stock-to-flow model harmful as BTC trades near $21,500, well below the model's $100,000+ projections.
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has denounced the popular Bitcoin stock-to-flow (S2F) price model as "harmful," joining a growing chorus of industry figures who argue the framework provides a false sense of certainty to investors. The critique follows a significant market downturn that has left Bitcoin trading at roughly $21,500, a level that deviates sharply from the model's previous projections of a $100,000 price tag by the end of 2021 [1, 3].
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Current Price | ~$21,500 |
| 24h Change | +5% |
| 18-Month Low | <$20,000 |
| Model Target | $100,000+ (for 2022) |
The stock-to-flow model, created by a pseudonymous analyst known as PlanB, attempts to value Bitcoin by comparing its circulating supply to the rate of new coin issuance, which is reduced by 50% every four years during "halving" events [1, 3]. While the model gained significant traction during the 2021 bull run—at one point predicting a price of $135,000 by December 2021—it began to diverge from actual market performance as Bitcoin failed to sustain its November 2021 all-time high of $69,000 [1, 2].
Buterin’s comments were prompted by a tweet from Ethereum educator Anthony Sassano, who labeled the model an "epic failure" [1, 3]. Buterin argued that financial models suggesting "number-will-go-up" with predestined certainty deserve mockery because they can mislead market participants [1, 2]. This criticism coincides with a broader market slump that recently pushed Bitcoin to an 18-month low below $20,000, casting doubt on the model's continued relevance [1].
PlanB has defended his work, characterizing the criticism as an attempt by others to find "scapegoats" for their own failed investment decisions or projects [1, 2]. The analyst maintained that he never provided financial advice or told users when to buy, noting that his analysis was shared for free [2].
Regarding the current state of the market, PlanB suggested that Bitcoin is either currently "extremely undervalued" and poised for a recovery, or the S2F model will prove less useful as a predictive tool in the future [1]. Despite the backlash, the analyst retains a significant following, with some supporters encouraging him to continue providing his perspective on market trends [2].
The debate highlights a deepening divide in the crypto industry between those who rely on scarcity-based valuation models and those who view such frameworks as fundamentally flawed. Whether the S2F model is eventually discarded or viewed as a relic of a specific market cycle remains an open question for investors.
Coverage is mostly measured — 115 of 126 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 3 outlets · Aug 28, 2026 · How we report
It is a mathematical ratio calculated by dividing the total existing supply of an asset (stock) by the amount of new supply produced annually (flow).
Halving events reduce the block reward for miners by 50%, which lowers the annual flow of new Bitcoin and increases the S2F ratio, theoretically signaling higher scarcity.
While it was influential in earlier cycles, its predictive accuracy has weakened as Bitcoin's price has frequently deviated from the model's projections, leading many to use it as a historical reference instead.
The model is applied because Bitcoin has a limited, code-defined supply schedule, making it comparable to scarce physical commodities like gold.