Loading article…
Energy Secretary Chris Wright was rebuked by a House committee chair after using an expletive during a heated exchange regarding federal grant decisions.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright was reprimanded by House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Chair Brian Babin (R-TX) on Wednesday after using an expletive during a contentious congressional hearing [1]. The outburst occurred while Wright was being questioned by Rep. Gabe Amo (D-RI) regarding the Department of Energy’s cancellation of hundreds of clean energy grants [1].
Key takeaways
The confrontation began when Rep. Amo questioned whether President Donald Trump had fulfilled his campaign promise to slash energy prices by 50% [1]. When Wright defended the administration's progress, Amo pivoted to the Department of Energy’s recent actions, charging that the agency had canceled over 300 projects in blue states, including $14 million in Rhode Island grants [1]. Amo cited internal DOE litigation, which reportedly stated that a primary factor in selecting which grants to terminate was the grantee's location in a blue state [1].
When Wright denied that politics played a role in the decision-making process, Amo pressed him on the outcomes of those cancellations [1]. Wright responded by snapping, "So it's bulls—! We're gonna say it a million times! Not true!" [1]. Following the outburst, Amo raised a point of parliamentary procedure, asking if the committee intended to promote such language from witnesses [1]. Chair Babin intervened, telling the Secretary to "watch your language," to which Wright agreed [1]. The hearing concluded with Amo accusing the Secretary of "bloviating" and performing for an audience of one—President Trump—rather than addressing the concerns of American families [1].
The incident highlights the intensifying friction between the administration and congressional Democrats, who are increasingly critical of the president’s focus on internal party control and legacy-building projects [2]. While House GOP leadership has attempted to maintain party unity, the administration's aggressive stance toward dissenters and its handling of federal resources have become central points of contention [2]. As the midterm elections approach, the debate over how federal funds are allocated and whether those decisions are influenced by political affiliation remains a significant flashpoint in Washington [1, 2].
Coverage is mostly measured — 4 of 4 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
President Trump nominated Jay Clayton, the former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and former head of the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell.
While a senior Trump administration official claims the parties have agreed to terms in writing, Iranian officials have not confirmed the deal, and both sides have released conflicting information regarding its contents.
Secretary Wright was questioned regarding the cancellation of hundreds of clean energy grants and allegations that these decisions were politically motivated against blue states.
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 3 outlets · Jun 12, 2026 · How we report