Loading article…
Galaxy’s new “Do Your Own Research” report outlines on‑chain metrics, data providers and a framework for valuing cryptoassets, giving analysts a concrete
A Galaxy research report launched this week as the opening installment of its “Do Your Own Research” series, delivering a comprehensive lexicon of on‑chain metrics and a valuation framework for cryptoassets [1]. The guide aims to equip analysts with the tools to assess intrinsic value directly from blockchain data, a capability that has grown in relevance as crypto adoption expands.
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Report title | Introduction to On‑Chain Fundamental Analysis |
| Release | First in Galaxy’s DO‑Y‑R series |
| Core focus | Lexicon of on‑chain metrics, data‑provider landscape, valuation framework |
| Intended audience | Crypto analysts seeking fundamentals beyond price or sentiment |
The report explains that on‑chain fundamentals differ from technical analysis or social‑sentiment measures by deriving value from raw blockchain activity such as issuance, transfers and supply [1]. It stresses that reliable valuation requires understanding a coin’s consensus and security model before applying any metric, and that many popular indicators—e.g., Bitcoin Days Destroyed, Network Value‑to‑Transactions, HODL Waves—were originally created for Bitcoin and may need adaptation for other assets [1].
Galaxy outlines the role of cross‑asset data providers like Coin Metrics, Glassnode, IntoTheBlock and Dune Analytics, which standardize raw blockchain data into comparable metrics [1]. Because each blockchain records transactions differently, providers must engineer bespoke calculations; for example, a “transaction” on one network may represent a distinct user action compared with another [1]. The report notes that newly launched tokens often experience a lag before their on‑chain metrics become available, as providers need time to ingest and index the data [1].
While advocating for on‑chain fundamentals, the guide cautions against treating them as a one‑size‑fits‑all solution. It recommends coupling on‑chain insights with technical analysis and sentiment data to form a holistic view of an asset’s valuation [1]. The authors argue that the evolving nature of blockchain technology and market dynamics demands frequent recalibration of metrics, mirroring the iterative process used in traditional finance [1].
The report underscores that on‑chain fundamental analysis is maturing into a sophisticated discipline, yet its effectiveness hinges on deep protocol knowledge and continual metric refinement—an open challenge as the crypto ecosystem diversifies.
Coverage is mostly measured — 103 of 109 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 2 outlets · Jul 19, 2026 · How we report
On-chain analysis is the examination of blockchain data—such as transactions, wallet balances, and smart contract activity—to understand transaction patterns, asset movements, and network health.
Platforms mentioned include Chainalysis, CryptoQuant, CoinDesk Data, Glassnode, and Artemis Terminal, each offering various dashboards, APIs, and analytics capabilities.
Traders use on-chain metrics like active wallet counts, transaction volume, and token holder distribution to gauge market sentiment and identify potential price movements.
Key metrics include transaction volume, number of active wallets, supply in profit or loss, realized capitalization, and total value locked in smart contracts.
Regulators, law enforcement, crypto exchanges, and financial institutions use on-chain analysis for fraud detection, risk management, and compliance.