Loading article…
XRP holds above $1.40 and XLM above $0.18, but recovery lags as geopolitical risks and declining futures open interest signal bearish sentiment.
XRP is trading at $1.065 and Stellar (XLM) at $0.179 on Tuesday, both extending declines amid broader risk-off conditions following renewed US-Iran tensions [1]. The cryptocurrencies are defending key support levels, but a sustained recovery remains elusive due to bearish derivatives metrics and geopolitical uncertainty [1, 3].
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| XRP Price | $1.065 [1] |
| XLM Price | $0.179 [1] |
| Key XRP Support | $1.050 [1] |
| Key XLM Support | $0.177 [1] |
| Catalyst | US-Iran tensions [1] |
Both XRP and XLM extended their correction on Tuesday as renewed tensions between the US and Iran dampened investor sentiment across global markets [1]. The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) reported new strikes on Iranian military targets, with over 50,000 US service members deployed in the Middle East [1]. Iran's Nournews confirmed hits in southern Iran's Bushehr, and the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) claimed two "offending supertankers" were disabled in the Strait of Hormuz [1]. This geopolitical uncertainty pushed West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil prices above $80 per barrel, while risk assets like XRP and XLM came under pressure [1].
Derivatives metrics for both assets show a bearish bias. XRP’s futures Open Interest (OI) dipped to $2.35 billion on Tuesday, continuing a downward trend since early July [1]. Similarly, XLM’s OI dropped to $180.95 million, falling steadily since a sharp rise in June [1]. These declines in OI alongside falling prices suggest a bearish outlook [1]. Additionally, XRP and XLM funding rates flipped negative on Monday, reading -0.0031% and -0.0021% respectively, and remained negative on Tuesday, indicating bearish sentiment among traders [1].
XRP is trading at $1.065 on Tuesday, remaining below its 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) at $1.157, 100-day EMA at $1.257, and 200-day EMA at $1.463, which act as overhead resistance levels [1]. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 39 remains in bearish territory, while the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator hovers just above zero, suggesting tentative stabilization rather than a clear recovery [1]. Immediate support for XRP is around $1.050, with a break below potentially exposing the psychological floor at $1.000 [1].
XLM is trading at $0.179 on Tuesday, holding below its 50-day EMA at $0.190, 100-day EMA at $0.186, and 200-day EMA at $0.196, maintaining a bearish near-term bias [1]. The RSI at 41 suggests weak momentum, and the MACD remains in negative territory [1]. Initial support for XLM appears at $0.177, followed by the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement at $0.173 [1].
| XRP Key Levels | XLM Key Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance 1 | $1.157 (50-day EMA) [1] | Resistance 1 | $0.186 (100-day EMA) [1] |
| Resistance 2 | $1.257 (100-day EMA) [1] | Resistance 2 | $0.190 (50-day EMA) [1] |
| Support 1 | $1.050 [1] | Support 1 | $0.177 [1] |
| Support 2 | $1.000 [1] | Support 2 | $0.173 (78.6% Fib) [1] |
The ongoing geopolitical tensions are a significant factor influencing risk assets, and their resolution or escalation will likely dictate the near-term direction for XRP and XLM, which currently face challenges in mounting a sustained recovery [1].
Coverage is mostly measured — 213 of 224 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 3 outlets · Aug 28, 2026 · How we report
As of the latest reports, XRP is trading in the $1.43 to $1.44 range following a period of volatility and a recent 27% weekly gain.
Recent SEC filings suggest that Ripple may deviate from historical patterns by releasing additional XRP from escrow to support on-ledger liquidity, pending legislative developments.
The 650% increase in active addresses suggests higher engagement from existing holders rather than a influx of new market participants.