Loading article…
Dario Amodei says he quit OpenAI over Sam Altman’s leadership and now backs Musk’s xAI‑Anthropic deal, citing trust issues and strategic compute needs.
Dario Amodei, Anthropic’s CEO, told reporters that his 2021 departure from OpenAI was driven by a lack of trust in Sam Altman, and that his current partnership with Elon Musk’s xAI reflects a shared belief that Altman’s growing power poses the biggest risk to Anthropic’s ambitions【1】.
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Departed OpenAI | 2021 (citing “the problem with OpenAI is Sam himself”)【1】 |
| New partnership | Anthropic + xAI data‑center deal (Colossus)【1】 |
| Compute access | Anthropic to use Colossus for inference; xAI to use Colossus 2 for its own workloads【1】 |
| Job‑impact forecast (Amodei) | AI could erase half of entry‑level white‑collar jobs in five years, driving 10‑20% unemployment【2】 |
Amodei’s public criticism of Altman dates back to 2021, when he said the core problem at OpenAI was Sam Altman himself【1】. The comment underscores a long‑standing governance rift that later manifested in Anthropic’s decision to secure external compute through Musk’s xAI rather than rely on traditional cloud providers. The partnership gives Anthropic access to the “Colossus” data centre—an Nvidia‑GPU‑heavy facility built to meet the token‑intensive demands of models like Claude Code—while allowing xAI to reserve the larger “Colossus 2” for its own scaling plans【1】. For Musk, the deal supplies a ready‑made workload for his hardware investments; for Amodei, it offers a compute lifeline without deepening ties to a competitor he distrusts.
OpenAI still dominates user numbers via ChatGPT and maintains a strong coding product in Codex, keeping it the primary barrier to Anthropic’s market share growth【1】. Meanwhile, Anthropic’s strategic compute constraints remain “thin and potentially fleeting,” prompting Amodei to view Musk’s resources as a more credible short‑term ally than Altman’s expanding infrastructure【1】. The collaboration also reflects a broader pattern in AI leadership: CEOs who publicly warn of existential AI risks—both Altman and Amodei—are now aligning to limit each other’s influence, rather than cooperating on safety initiatives.
Amodei’s earlier warning that AI could wipe out half of entry‑level white‑collar positions within five years, pushing unemployment to 10‑20%, has not materialised as a mass layoff wave. Labor data through early 2026 shows only a modest 13% relative decline for workers aged 22‑25 in the most AI‑exposed jobs, while older, experienced staff remain stable【2】. The gap between Amodei’s alarmist forecast and current employment trends highlights the difficulty of translating technical risk assessments into concrete market predictions.
Amodei’s departure and his current alliance with Musk illustrate how personal trust issues can reshape AI competition, raising the question of whether strategic compute deals will become the primary lever for challengers to OpenAI’s dominance.
Coverage is mostly measured — 96 of 118 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 2 outlets · Jun 18, 2026 · How we report
He says the rivalry is about differing visions and market outcomes, noting that both companies are pursuing their own approaches and that trust varies among AI firms.
OpenAI's revenue grew from $3.7 billion in 2024 to $13.07 billion in 2025, with monthly revenues reaching nearly $2 billion by the end of 2025.
Research and development costs rose from $7.81 billion to $19.18 billion, and cost of revenue increased from $2.65 billion to $7.5 billion, contributing to higher operating losses.