Loading article…
Dario Amodei says he quit OpenAI over Sam Altman’s leadership and now backs Musk’s xAI‑Anthropic deal, citing trust issues and strategic compute needs.
Dario Amodei, Anthropic’s CEO, told reporters that his 2021 departure from OpenAI was driven by a lack of trust in Sam Altman, and that his current partnership with Elon Musk’s xAI reflects a shared belief that Altman’s growing power poses the biggest risk to Anthropic’s ambitions【1】.
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Departed OpenAI | 2021 (citing “the problem with OpenAI is Sam himself”)【1】 |
| New partnership | Anthropic + xAI data‑center deal (Colossus)【1】 |
| Compute access | Anthropic to use Colossus for inference; xAI to use Colossus 2 for its own workloads【1】 |
| Job‑impact forecast (Amodei) | AI could erase half of entry‑level white‑collar jobs in five years, driving 10‑20% unemployment【2】 |
Amodei’s public criticism of Altman dates back to 2021, when he said the core problem at OpenAI was Sam Altman himself【1】. The comment underscores a long‑standing governance rift that later manifested in Anthropic’s decision to secure external compute through Musk’s xAI rather than rely on traditional cloud providers. The partnership gives Anthropic access to the “Colossus” data centre—an Nvidia‑GPU‑heavy facility built to meet the token‑intensive demands of models like Claude Code—while allowing xAI to reserve the larger “Colossus 2” for its own scaling plans【1】. For Musk, the deal supplies a ready‑made workload for his hardware investments; for Amodei, it offers a compute lifeline without deepening ties to a competitor he distrusts.
OpenAI still dominates user numbers via ChatGPT and maintains a strong coding product in Codex, keeping it the primary barrier to Anthropic’s market share growth【1】. Meanwhile, Anthropic’s strategic compute constraints remain “thin and potentially fleeting,” prompting Amodei to view Musk’s resources as a more credible short‑term ally than Altman’s expanding infrastructure【1】. The collaboration also reflects a broader pattern in AI leadership: CEOs who publicly warn of existential AI risks—both Altman and Amodei—are now aligning to limit each other’s influence, rather than cooperating on safety initiatives.
Amodei’s earlier warning that AI could wipe out half of entry‑level white‑collar positions within five years, pushing unemployment to 10‑20%, has not materialised as a mass layoff wave. Labor data through early 2026 shows only a modest 13% relative decline for workers aged 22‑25 in the most AI‑exposed jobs, while older, experienced staff remain stable【2】. The gap between Amodei’s alarmist forecast and current employment trends highlights the difficulty of translating technical risk assessments into concrete market predictions.
Amodei’s departure and his current alliance with Musk illustrate how personal trust issues can reshape AI competition, raising the question of whether strategic compute deals will become the primary lever for challengers to OpenAI’s dominance.
Coverage is mostly measured — 293 of 300 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 2 outlets · Jun 18, 2026 · How we report
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has expressed that he expected Congress to create a basic framework for advanced AI following his 2023 testimony, but he has also stated that OpenAI is capable of self-regulating. As of September 2026, OpenAI is working with other labs on voluntary safety efforts, noting that lawmakers have struggled to regulate the technology without slowing innovation.
OpenAI aims to advance technology toward superintelligence, also known as Artificial General Intelligence, in a way that benefits humans. The company states that this development includes protecting humanity from the existential risks associated with such powerful systems.
Critics argue that OpenAI and other tech firms cannot be trusted to prioritize public safety over profit and that leaving critical decisions to a small group of wealthy individuals is dangerous. As of September 2026, some researchers and political figures maintain that independent, non-profit oversight is necessary to prevent potential catastrophic outcomes.