Loading article…
FTC warns crypto ATM fraud surged 1,000% since 2020, with $388 M lost in 2025 – see the demographics, state bans and pending federal bill.
A FTC report shows money lost to cryptocurrency‑ATM scams jumped 1,000 % from 2020 to 2023, and victims reported $388 million in losses in 2025 – a 58 % rise over 2024 [1]. The surge threatens older consumers and is prompting state bans and a federal fraud‑prevention bill.
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Loss increase (2020‑2023) | +1,000 % |
| 2025 losses | $388 million (↑58 % YoY) |
| Avg loss for victims ≥ 60 y | $10,000 |
| State action | Indiana ban (Mar 2026); Tennessee (effective Jul 1 2026); Minnesota (effective Aug 1 2026) |
Crypto ATMs look like traditional machines but dispense cryptocurrency instead of cash, allowing instant transfers to any wallet. Scammers exploit the anonymity and speed of these transfers, often posing as law‑enforcement officers, government officials or tech‑support agents. They pressure victims to withdraw cash, deposit it into a crypto ATM, and scan a QR code that sends the funds to the fraudster’s wallet. Victims over 60 are more than three times as likely to report losses, with an average hit of $10,000 per case [1].
Three states – Indiana, Tennessee and Minnesota – have enacted outright bans on crypto ATMs, with the latter two taking effect in mid‑2026 [1]. Other states such as South Dakota, Arizona and Colorado have imposed transaction caps and refund provisions. At the federal level, Senator Richard Durbin’s Crypto Fraud ATM Fraud Prevention Act, filed in February 2025, would require operators to register with the Treasury, limit daily and 14‑day transaction totals, mandate verification calls for large transfers, and enforce blockchain‑analytics checks to block known fraudulent wallets [1]. The bill is currently referred to the Senate Banking Committee.
The FTC advises consumers to treat any unsolicited phone, email or text that urges a crypto‑ATM deposit as suspicious. No legitimate agency will ask you to move cash into a cryptocurrency wallet to “protect” funds or pay for services [1][2]. Verifying the caller’s identity, avoiding urgency tactics, and never clicking links or providing personal data are the core defenses. Victims rarely recover stolen funds, especially when amounts are under $100,000, because the perpetrators operate internationally and tracing crypto across borders is costly [2].
The FTC’s data underscores that crypto‑ATM fraud is no longer a niche problem; it is a growing vector targeting older adults and prompting coordinated state and federal responses. Whether legislative action can curb the rapid rise in losses remains to be seen.
Coverage is mostly measured — 63 of 65 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 3 outlets · Jun 25, 2026 · How we report
Imposter scams, where fraudsters pose as law enforcement, government officials, or tech support, convince victims to withdraw cash and deposit it via a QR code into a crypto ATM.
Indiana, Tennessee, and Minnesota have enacted bans, while South Dakota, Arizona, Colorado, Arkansas, Virginia, and Wisconsin have implemented transaction caps and refund rules.
The Crypto Fraud ATM Fraud Prevention Act would require ATM operators to register with the Treasury, limit transaction amounts, enforce verification calls, use blockchain analytics, and provide refunds if victims report scams within 30 days.
The DOJ seized backend cloud accounts linked to the Huione Group, aiming to disrupt the service layer that enables large‑scale illicit finance and money‑laundering.
According to the FTC, they are over three times more likely to lose money in these scams, often due to the high‑pressure tactics used in imposter schemes.