Loading article…
President Trump and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong are lobbying for the CLARITY Act to establish US crypto regulations. Senate vote expected September 15.
President Donald Trump and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong are intensifying pressure on the U.S. Senate to pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, a legislative framework that would define regulatory jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies [2]. The bill, which passed the House of Representatives in July 2025, remains stalled in the Senate, with industry leaders arguing that its passage is essential to maintaining U.S. competitiveness against China [2].
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Legislative Status | House passed July 2025; Senate pending |
| Senate Vote Target | September 15, 2026 |
| Primary Catalyst | White House push for regulatory clarity |
| Key Objective | SEC/CFTC jurisdictional split |
The CLARITY Act aims to resolve long-standing friction between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) by establishing clear boundaries for digital asset oversight [1]. Under the proposed framework, the CFTC would gain exclusive authority over spot markets and cryptocurrencies connected to "mature blockchains"—defined as systems not controlled by any single person or group [1]. Assets meeting this criteria would be classified as digital commodities rather than securities, exempting them from SEC registration requirements [1].
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who joined the President at a White House press conference, stated that the bill would create "durable" crypto policies capable of surviving for decades [2]. While the bill has faced opposition regarding stablecoin yield provisions and potential conflicts of interest, Armstrong expressed optimism that the legislation could secure the 60 votes required to overcome a cloture motion scheduled for September 15 [2].
The legislative delay has forced regulators to act independently of Congress. The SEC recently proposed new rules offering companies a "safe harbor" from having tokens treated as investment contracts, while the CFTC continues to explore its own regulatory path through its Innovation Advisory Committee [2]. These moves coincide with broader institutional interest; Ark Invest, led by Cathie Wood, has been actively increasing its holdings in Coinbase and Circle, signaling a bet that a formal regulatory framework will eventually materialize [1].
Political hurdles remain significant. While the bill has bipartisan support, only two Democrats had publicly committed to the legislation as of July 7 [1]. Critics, including Senator Ruben Gallego, have questioned the motivations behind the White House's involvement, noting that the President's push for a "fair version" of the bill may be influenced by personal interests rather than purely legislative goals [2].
The outcome of the September vote will determine whether the U.S. adopts a unified federal framework for digital assets or continues to rely on fragmented agency-led enforcement. Until then, the industry remains in a holding pattern, awaiting a legislative signal that could define the operational landscape for exchanges and issuers for years to come.
Coverage is mostly measured — 191 of 201 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 3 outlets · Aug 21, 2026 · How we report
Perpetual derivatives are futures contracts that do not have an expiration date, allowing traders to hold leveraged positions indefinitely through periodic funding payments.
Coinbase contends that current regulatory overlap between the SEC and CFTC creates a 'jurisdictional fog' that prevents US-based platforms from offering perpetual derivatives that are widely available in other jurisdictions.
CONL is designed to deliver 200% of the daily percentage move of Coinbase stock; because it resets its exposure daily, its cumulative performance over longer periods can differ significantly from twice the performance of the underlying stock.