# Coinbase wins dismissal of most Manhattan token‑sale lawsuit

**Published:** 2026-07-31T07:54:22.299Z  
**Topic:** Coinbase  
**Sentiment:** neutral  
**Publisher:** TrendWatcher — https://www.trendwatcher.in/article/3d9c76fd-1924-4582-8bb8-6b1ba26acebe

Coinbase cleared of claims covering 99.97% of its trading volume (hundreds of billions) while still facing $178 million inventory‑sale claims – see what

Coinbase secured a partial victory on July 30, 2026, as a Manhattan federal judge tossed claims tied to virtually all of its matched trades – representing roughly 99.97% of trading volume – but left open the narrower “inventory” sales that total at least $178 million [2].

| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Dismissed claims | 99.97% of trading volume (hundreds of billions) |
| Remaining claims | $178 million in inventory‑filled sales |
| Tokens involved | > 60, including XRP and Dogecoin |
| Judge | U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer |

## Majority of trades cleared  
The court’s decision hinged on how orders were fulfilled. Coinbase argued that the overwhelming majority of trades were “matched” – buyer and seller orders paired on the platform – and therefore did not constitute a statutory sale under the Securities Act. Judge Engelmayer agreed, dismissing all claims based on those matched transactions, which the exchange estimates represent hundreds of billions of dollars in volume [1][2].  

## Inventory sales remain vulnerable  
The ruling treats Coinbase as a “statutory seller” for the small slice of trades filled from its own token inventory. Those inventory transactions account for the remaining 0.03% of volume and involve at least $178 million in sales. Because Coinbase passed title to the tokens in these cases, the judge said customers may continue pursuing claims that the exchange acted as a dealer and underwriter [1][2].  

## Legal backdrop and industry reaction  
The case, filed in 2021, focuses on Section 12(a)(1) of the Securities Act, which can impose liability on parties that directly transfer securities or solicit their purchase for financial benefit. The Digital Chamber, a crypto trade group that supported Coinbase, warned that a broad definition of “statutory seller” could curb innovation and push trading to non‑U.S. venues [1][2]. The decision follows the SEC’s 2025 dismissal of its own enforcement action against Coinbase, signaling a shifting regulatory environment for U.S. crypto exchanges.  

## What to watch
- Any court filings or motions concerning the $178 million inventory‑sale claims.  
- Potential appeals by customers targeting the remaining statutory‑seller exposure.  
- Statements from the Digital Chamber or other industry groups on how the ruling may affect future token‑listing practices.  

The partial dismissal narrows the legal exposure for Coinbase but leaves a concrete $178 million liability path open, underscoring how the definition of “statutory seller” will continue to shape the regulatory landscape for crypto exchanges.

## Sources
1. Hoodline — [Coinbase Scores Big Manhattan Win In Crypto Token Lawsuit](https://hoodline.com/2026/07/coinbase-scores-big-manhattan-win-in-crypto-token-lawsuit/)
2. Srnnews — [Coinbase beats much of customer lawsuit over US token sales ...](https://srnnews.com/coinbase-beats-much-of-customer-lawsuit-over-us-token-sales/)
3. Claimsjournal — [Coinbase Beats Much of Customer Lawsuit Over US Token Sales](https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/national/2026/07/31/339207.htm)
4. Crypto Briefing — [Coinbase wins landmark lawsuit as SEC drops case that could ...](https://cryptobriefing.com/coinbase-wins-sec-lawsuit-crypto-regulation/)

---
Cite as: TrendWatcher, "Coinbase wins dismissal of most Manhattan token‑sale lawsuit", https://www.trendwatcher.in/article/3d9c76fd-1924-4582-8bb8-6b1ba26acebe