Loading article…
Crypto fraud hit U.S. users with an estimated $80.7 B loss in 2025, over half of all online‑scam losses, highlighting a steep rise and huge under‑reporting.
Investors lost an estimated $80.7 billion to crypto‑related scams in 2025, a figure derived by applying a 7.1‑times multiplier to the FBI’s reported $11.37 billion loss — the largest single category of online fraud that year [3].
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Reported crypto fraud loss (FBI) | $11.37 B |
| Adjusted estimate (CFA multiplier) | $80.7 B |
| Share of total online‑scam losses | > 50 % |
| Year‑over‑year increase (reported) | +22 % |
The Consumer Federation of America (CFA) used a 7.1‑fold adjustment based on a 2017 Bureau of Justice Statistics survey that found only 14 % of fraud victims report to authorities. Applying that factor to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) data yields the $80.7 B estimate for crypto scams alone, while the total online‑scam cost across all categories is projected at $148.2 B [2][3]. Investment fraud was the biggest sub‑category, with reported losses of $8.6 B and an adjusted estimate of $61.4 B, up 32 % from 2024 [3].
Separately, blockchain security firm Certik reported that crypto hacks and scams cost investors $2.5 B in the first half of 2025, up from $1.98 B in 2024. Two incidents— a $1.5 B theft from Bybit attributed to North Korean actors and a $220 M exploit of the Cetus DEX— accounted for roughly 70 % of those losses [1]. Wallet compromises ($1.71 B) and phishing attacks ($410.75 M) were the most common methods, mirroring the tactics that drive the larger CFA‑derived losses [1].
Older Americans (60 + years) bore the brunt of crypto fraud, losing $4.4 B, nearly 40 % of the total crypto‑related losses [3]. Meanwhile, younger users (under 20) saw a 198 % surge in reported losses year‑over‑year, indicating rapid adoption of crypto assets among new investors [2].
The $80.7 B estimate underscores how severely crypto fraud skews the overall picture of online crime in the United States, revealing a massive gap between reported and actual losses. Whether tighter platform controls or improved victim reporting can narrow that gap remains an open question.
Coverage is mostly measured — 216 of 218 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 4 outlets · Aug 2, 2026 · How we report
As of 14 September 2026, the Peru Ministry of Economy and Finance reported that its official X account was compromised by attackers who used the platform to promote a fraudulent token called $HYLO. The ministry confirmed the posts were unauthorized and stated that no financial losses were reported in connection with the incident.
The Revolut data disclosure, reported in September 2026, involved the release of customer full names, birth dates, occupations, postal addresses, email addresses, and telephone numbers. Additionally, the impersonator obtained copies of passports or driving licenses, verification selfies, IBANs, and complete Bitcoin transaction histories.
MetaMask utilizes AI-powered security partners like Blockaid to analyze websites, social feeds, and on-chain bytecode to identify phishing and malicious behavior in real time. The wallet also employs Added Protection, a feature that automatically reverts transactions that do not match their previews, and provides warnings for lookalike addresses and first-time recipients.
Scammers exploit government accounts because these platforms command high levels of public trust, which can be used to legitimize fraudulent schemes. By posting on official channels, perpetrators can more effectively use urgency—such as fake token launch dates—to bypass the critical thinking of potential victims.