Loading article…
Optimism layer‑2 suffers a $35 million token loss after 20 million OP were sent to the wrong address and stolen, highlighting security risks for Ethereum
Optimism’s native OP token suffered a $35 million loss when 20 million tokens were mistakenly sent to an unsynced Ethereum address and promptly stolen by a hacker on June 1 2024 [2].
| At a glance | |
|---|---|
| Token | OP |
| Tokens lost | 20 million |
| Approx. value lost | $35 million |
| Catalyst | Mis‑routed transfer to unsynced L2 address leading to hack |
Optimism, an Ethereum layer‑2 scaling solution, intended to airdrop 20 million OP tokens to its DAO stakeholders via market maker Wintermute. The transfer was sent to Wintermute’s Ethereum (L1) address, but because the address had not been linked to an Optimism (L2) address, the tokens remained on L1 and were inaccessible. Within 24 hours, an anonymous actor seized the entire 20 million‑token batch, selling 1 million on the market while retaining the remaining 19 million [2].
Wintermute confirmed the error on May 30 and later disclosed that the stolen tokens could not be recovered through a high‑risk operation. The market maker has since repurchased the 1 million OP tokens sold by the hacker, but the remaining 19 million remain missing. Optimism reports that the stolen tokens have not yet been used to influence DAO governance, though the incident underscores the heightened risk profile of layer‑2 operations that bypass Ethereum’s congested mainnet [2].
The hack illustrates that while layer‑2 solutions promise faster, cheaper transactions, they also introduce new vectors for loss when address synchronization fails, raising questions about the robustness of scaling infrastructure as Ethereum adoption grows.
Coverage is mostly measured — 59 of 59 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 2 outlets · Jul 16, 2026 · How we report
They aim to increase transaction throughput and lower costs by processing transactions off the main blockchain and settling them on the Layer 1 chain.
They inherit security from the underlying Layer 1 blockchain, using its consensus mechanism to resolve disputes and finalize transactions.
Yes, they can be built atop various Layer 1 networks, such as Ethereum and Bitcoin, though the specific implementations may differ.