Loading article…

Manuel Aráoz claims AI agents make DeFi unsafe, advising exit from major protocols as the industry debates security risks and defenses.
Manuel Aráoz, co-founder of smart contract auditor OpenZeppelin, has declared the entire decentralized finance (DeFi) sector unsafe and advised friends and family to exit all positions, citing advances in artificial intelligence that allow coding agents to find vulnerabilities with "superhuman" capability [1]. This stark assessment follows a period of significant losses, with over $1.1 billion drained from DeFi in the past year and April recording the highest volume of crypto hacks on record [2].
Key takeaways
Aráoz pointed to the release of Anthropic’s Mythos model, which reportedly uncovered critical bugs in software that had run in production for decades, as evidence that the security landscape has fundamentally changed [1]. He explained that smart contract security is asymmetric because defenders must fix every bug while attackers need only one exploit to succeed [1]. Venture capital firm a16z noted that AI agents can now identify critical weaknesses that previously required deep technical expertise, effectively lowering the barrier to entry for attackers [2]. Due to these implications, exchanges such as Coinbase have reportedly reached out to Anthropic to gain access to the restricted Mythos system [1].
Not all industry leaders agree with the assessment that the space is inherently unsafe. Aave founder Stani Kulechov and Uniswap founder Hayden Adams countered that the same AI capabilities used by attackers are increasingly being utilized by security researchers and auditors to bolster defenses [1]. Marc Zeller of the Aave Chan Initiative criticized the warning as "moronic," noting that less than 10% of DeFi issues in the past year stemmed from the actual codebase [1]. OpenZeppelin, the firm Aráoz co-founded, clarified that his views do not reflect the company's official position, as he left in 2019 [1]. While Aráoz focused on code vulnerabilities, recent incidents like the compromise of stablecoin issuer StablR illustrate that social engineering and centralized key management remain significant weak points [1].
Coverage is mostly measured — 32 of 37 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 2 outlets · Jun 2, 2026 ·
Uniswap is a signatory to a letter urging the Senate to pass the act, specifically emphasizing the importance of Section 604, which provides regulatory certainty for blockchain developers.
Unlike vAMMs, which use virtual accounting entries for pricing, Uniswap v3 utilizes real capital supplied by liquidity providers to back its liquidity curves.
Developers argue that the act is necessary to shield those who do not custody user funds from being classified as money transmitters or facing federal prosecution for building open-source software.
The debate highlights a critical tension in the crypto industry: the conflict between the permissionless ideals of DeFi and the need for centralized safety mechanisms like circuit breakers and multisig controls [2]. As the sector's total value locked dropped from $172 billion to $148 billion recently, the industry appears to be moving toward an "AI versus AI" security paradigm where automated agents on both sides dictate the safety of user funds [2]. Projects like Jack Dorsey’s Block are already attempting to flip the asymmetry by using AI to scan software for vulnerabilities before they can be exploited [1].