Loading article…

Microsoft is reportedly considering job cuts focused on middle management while simultaneously defending against a patent lawsuit from a Native American tribe.
Microsoft is reportedly evaluating a new round of job cuts that could begin as early as May, with a specific focus on reducing the number of middle managers and non-coding staff [1]. Simultaneously, the company is facing a legal challenge from the St. Regis Mohawk tribe, which has filed a lawsuit alleging that Microsoft and Amazon have infringed on its data processing patents [2].
Key takeaways
Internal discussions at Microsoft suggest a push to increase the "span of control," which refers to the number of employees reporting to a single manager [1]. Leaders are specifically looking to adjust the "PM ratio," or the balance between program managers and engineers [1]. This approach mirrors a concept known as the "builder ratio" used at Amazon, which tracks the proportion of software engineers to non-builders [1]. For instance, the security organization at Microsoft is reportedly aiming for a 10-to-1 ratio of engineers to program managers, up from the current 5½-to-1 [1].
The potential layoffs may also impact employees identified as low performers [1]. The company evaluates staff using a "ManageRewards slider" scale, and there is consideration for terminating individuals who have received an "Impact 80" score or lower for two consecutive years [1]. While the exact number of job cuts remains unclear, sources indicate it could represent a significant portion of certain teams [1]. Microsoft has not provided a comment regarding these potential personnel changes [1].
The legal action brought by the St. Regis Mohawk tribe involves supercomputer patents that the tribe acquired from SRC Labs in August [2]. By filing the complaint in a Virginia court, the tribe is seeking both royalties and damages for the alleged use of its data processing technologies [2]. A unique aspect of this case is the tribe's reliance on sovereign immunity, which is intended to shield it from government-led patent challenges, such as inter partes review (IPR) [2].
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board frequently revokes patents during IPR proceedings, a process that both Microsoft and Amazon have utilized in the past to defend against similar claims [2]. The tribe’s strategy follows a similar move by the pharmaceutical company Allergan, which previously transferred patents to the same tribe to avoid IPRs, though that effort faced setbacks in federal court [2].
The dual pressure of internal restructuring and external litigation highlights the complex operational and legal environment currently facing major tech firms. Microsoft’s focus on efficiency and engineering-heavy staffing reflects a broader industry trend of streamlining management layers [1]. Meanwhile, the tribe’s use of sovereign immunity in patent litigation represents a novel legal strategy that could influence how companies protect and defend intellectual property in the future [2].
Coverage is mostly measured — 207 of 229 reports stay neutral.
Every Monday — the token unlocks, Fed dates & catalysts set to move crypto and markets this week. So you’re never blindsided.
Free · 3-min read · one-click unsubscribe
AI-assisted synthesis by the TrendWatcher Editorial Desk · sourced from 3 outlets · Jun 12, 2026 · How we report
The sources contain only image placeholders without accompanying text, so no concrete information about OpenAI is presented.